The ancient Near East |
---|
Regions and States |
Fertile Crescent Mesopotamia • Akkadian Empire • Assyria • Babylonia • Neo-Assyrian Empire • Neo-Babylonian Empire • Sumer |
Archaeological Periods |
Chronology • Bronze Age • Bronze Age collapse • Iron Age |
Languages |
Akkadian • Aramaic • Assyriology • Cuneiform script • Elamite • Hebrew • Hittite • Hurrian • Phoenician • Sumerian • Urartian |
Literature |
Babylonian literature • Hittite texts • Sumerian literature |
Mythology |
Babylonian mythology • Hittite mythology • Mesopotamian mythology • Egyptian mythology |
Other topics |
Cradle of civilization • Assyrian law • Babylonian astronomy • Babylonian law • Babylonian mathematics • Cuneiform law • History of the Middle East |
Mesopotamia • Akkadian Empire • Assyria • Babylonia • Neo-Assyrian Empire • Neo-Babylonian Empire • Sumer
Egypt • Ancient Egypt
Persia • Achaemenid Empire • Elam • Medes
Anatolia • Hittites • Hurrians • Neo-Hittite states • Urartu
The Levant • Ancient Israel • Phoenicia
The middle chronology is one chronology of the Near Eastern Bronze and Early Iron Age, which fixes the reign of Hammurabi to 1792–1750 BCE and the sack of Babylon to 1595 BCE.
The chronology is based on a 56/64-year astronomical calculation determined by evidence from the Venus tablet of Ammisaduqa and the Enuma anu enlil tablet 63. Conventional textbooks tend to use the middle chronology, but early dendrochronological and astronomical evidence presented various problems for it. This led to increased adoption of the short chronologies by some. However, more recent studies have shown that the Middle Chronology is most likely.