Red Sea Afar Democratic Organisation
| Red Sea Afar Democratic Organisation | |
|---|---|
| Participant in the Second Afar insurgency | |
Logo of RSADO
|
|
| Active | 1999–present |
| Ideology | Afar self-determination |
| Groups | Red Sea Afar Youth League |
| Leaders |
Ibrahim Harun Yasin Mohamed Nesredin Ali (spokesperson) Ahmed Humad Ali Osman Ma'ar |
| Headquarters | Afar Region, Ethiopia |
| Area of operations | Southern Red Sea Region, Eritrea |
| Part of | Eritrean Democratic Alliance |
| Allies |
State allies Non-state allies |
| Opponents |
 Eritrea
|
| Battles and wars | Second Afar insurgency |
| Website | www |
| Flag |  |
State allies
Non-state allies
The Red Sea Afar Democratic Organisation (Tigrinya: Qasa Badih Qafarih Dimokraasih Missoyna; Amharic: ዲሞክራሲያዊ ውድብ ዓፋር ቀይሕ ባሕሪ; Arabic: التنظيم الديمقراطي لعفر البحر الأحمر, transliteration: Al-tanzim Al-dimokrati Li-'afar Al-Bahr Al-Ahmar; abbreviated RSADO) is an Eritrean political organisation and armed insurgent group based in Ethiopia. The organisation is made up of mainly ethnic Afar people, and was founded in early 1999 following a revolt by the Red Sea Afar people led by Ahmed Humed, after the UN-supervised Eritrean independence referendum was held in 1993. The primary goal of RSADO is to achieve autonomy for the region known as Dankalia, inhabited mainly by the Red Sea Afar.
RSADO is also a member of the Eritrean Democratic Alliance (EDA), a coalition of 11 Eritrean political organisations attempting to overthrow Eritrean president Isaias Afwerki's regime.
Following the independence of Eritrea in May 1991, indigenous Afar started to face unprecedented persecution by the authoritarian, one-party government of the People’s Front for Democracy and Justice led by Isaias Afwerki. The government of Eritrea began systemically removing the Red Sea Afar from their ancestral homeland, robbing them of their indigenous identity, denying them the rights to own and live off their traditional land and territories, destroying the basis of the Red Sea Afar economies such as fishing and animal husbandry, and confiscating Afar businesses.
The rule of Shabia was unreservedly welcomed by the Kebesa community while the bulk of Muslims were skeptically watching the situation and wishing that Shabia would rise up to the occasion and their fears would be proved wrong. They adopted a wait and see attitude giving the regime the benefit of doubt, but the regime did not attempt to take advantage of the opportunity and win back their trust or play down their fears and suspicions. The regime lost no time in exposing its partisan and partial nature totally ignoring their feelings. The regime went on harassing, imprisoning and purging citizens who dared to stand for their basic rights or even at a mere suspicion that they entertain such thoughts. This vindicated the worst fears that haunted the Muslims ever since Shabia's control of power
...
Wikipedia