*** Welcome to piglix ***

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

R (Miller and another)
(Miller and Dos Santos) v
Secretary of State
(Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union)
Middlesex Guildhall.png
Court UK Supreme Court
Full case name
  • R (on the application of Miller and another Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
  • R (on the application of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, ex parte Agnew and others (Northern Ireland)
  • R (on the application of McCord) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland)
Decided 24 January 2017
Citation(s) [2017] UKSC 5[19]
  • For the Miller and Dos Santos application:
    (On appeal from
    [2016] EWHC 2768[20][21][22])
  • For the Northern Ireland applications:
    (On referral from
    [2016] NIQB 85[23])
Case history
Appealed from Appealed from:
Referred from:
  • For the McCord application:
    Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland) (NICA)
  • For the application by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland:
    Divisional Court (Queen's Bench Division) of the High Court (Northern Ireland) (NIQB)
Case opinions
Court membership
Judges sitting Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Hodge
Concurrence Neuberger, Hale, Mance, Kerr, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge
Concur/dissent Reed, Carnwath, Hughes (all dissented on royal prerogative point, all concurred on devolution point)
Keywords

R (on the application of Miller and Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a legal case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the UK Government (the executive) may not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union as prescribed by Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union without an Act of the UK Parliament permitting the government to do so. Two days later, the government responded by bringing to Parliament the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill 2017 for first reading in the House of Commons on 26 January 2017. The case is informally referred to as "the Miller case" or Miller's case,

The Supreme Court's decision was given on appeal from the High Court's ruling that the Crown's foreign affairs prerogative, which is exercised by the government led by the prime minister, may not be used to nullify rights that parliament has enacted through primary legislation. The case was seen as having constitutional significance in deciding the scope of the royal prerogative in foreign affairs. The Supreme Court also ruled that devolved legislatures in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have no legal right to veto the act.

The government's appeal was against the High Court order dated 7 November 2016 that formally declared: "The Secretary of State does not have power under the Crown's prerogative to give notice pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union for the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union." The Supreme Court heard the appeal from 5 December 2016 to 8 December 2016, and, by a majority of 8–3, upheld the High Court ruling, finding that authorisation by Parliament was required for the invocation of Article 50.


...
Wikipedia

...