Nicholas C. Bodman | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Born |
Chicago |
July 27, 1913||||||
Died | June 29, 1997 Northfield, Minnesota |
(aged 83)||||||
Nationality | American | ||||||
Fields | Sino-Tibetan linguistics | ||||||
Institutions | Cornell University | ||||||
Alma mater | Yale University | ||||||
Doctoral students | William H. Baxter | ||||||
Chinese name | |||||||
Traditional Chinese | 包擬古 | ||||||
Simplified Chinese | 包拟古 | ||||||
|
Transcriptions | |
---|---|
Standard Mandarin | |
Hanyu Pinyin | Bāo Nǐgǔ |
Nicholas Cleaveland Bodman (July 27, 1913 – June 29, 1997) was an American linguist who made fundamental contributions to the study of historical Chinese phonology and Sino-Tibetan languages.
Bodman was born in Chicago in 1913. He entered Harvard in 1935, but left after one year and spent several years doing office work and traveling in Europe. He joined the United States Navy in 1941, and was assigned to Station HYPO at Pearl Harbor in early 1942 to join the team working to decipher Japanese naval codes. He retired from the navy in 1945 with the rank of Lieutenant commander.
After leaving the navy, Bodman enrolled at Yale, where he obtained his B.A., M.A., and Ph.D., with a study of the phonology of the Shiming. He worked at the Foreign Service Institute from 1950 until 1962, rising to head to the Department of Far Eastern languages. Between 1951 and 1952, he was in Malaya on loan to the British government, where he created a course on Hokkien that is still a definitive reference.
In 1962, Bodman joined the faculty of Cornell University, where he stayed until his retirement in 1979. He continued to do fieldwork on Tibeto-Burman languages and Min dialects. In an unpublished paper presented at Princeton in 1971, he proposed a novel six-vowel system for a stage of Chinese prior to the Old Chinese of the earliest records. This system was later developed as a proposal for Old Chinese itself by Bodman's student William Baxter, and independently by Sergei Starostin and Zhengzhang Shangfang, and is now widely accepted. He marshaled his ideas on Old Chinese and its relationship with Sino-Tibetan in an influential treatment published in 1980. Later he published a series of papers reconstructing the history of the Min group.