Andrew Cheng Kar-foo | |
---|---|
鄭家富 | |
Member of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong | |
In office 1 July 1998 – 30 September 2012 |
|
Preceded by | New parliament |
Succeeded by | Fernando Cheung |
Constituency | New Territories East |
In office 11 October 1995 – 30 June 1997 |
|
Preceded by | New constituency |
Succeeded by | Parliament abolished |
Constituency | Financial, Insurance, Real Estate and Business Services |
Personal details | |
Born |
Hong Kong |
28 April 1960
Nationality | Chinese (Hong Kong) |
Political party | Independent |
Other political affiliations |
Democratic Party (1994–2010) Meeting Point (until 1994) |
Spouse(s) | Chan Kwai-ying |
Alma mater | University of New South Wales |
Occupation | Solicitor |
Website | http://www.chengkarfoo.org |
Andrew Cheng | |||||||||
Traditional Chinese | 鄭家富 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcriptions | |
---|---|
Yue: Cantonese | |
Yale Romanization | Jihng Gā fu |
Jyutping | Zeng6 Gaa1 fu3 |
Andrew Cheng Kar-foo (Chinese: 鄭家富) BA, MA, MEd, PCLL (born 28 April 1960 in Hong Kong) was a Hong Kong politician and solicitor. He is a former Democratic Party member of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong representing the New Territories East geographical constituency.
He was a founder member of the Democratic Party, previously a member of the Meeting Point. He was a member of Southern District Council (representing Ap Lei Chau Estate) between 1994-99 and of Tai Po District Council (representing Tai Po Central) from 1999-2011.
Cheng was first elected to the Legislative Council in 1995 representing the Financial, Insurance, Real Estate and Business Services constituency but left the Council when it was replaced by the Provisional Legislative Council in July 1997.
He was elected to represent the New Territories East constituency in 1998 and won re-election in 2000, 2004 and 2008.
In June 2010, Cheng publicly pondered his moral dilemma in supporting the vote in support of the revised electoral reform proposals put forward by the government and backed by the Democratic Party. The proposal draw unprecedented controversy in the pan-democractic camp as the leaders of the Democratic Party had met with and sought approval from the officials of the Central Government Liaison Office.