Romanesque arch at White Ladies Priory.
|
|
Monastery information | |
---|---|
Full name | St Leonard's Priory, Brewood |
Other names | Convent of White Nuns |
Order | Augustinian |
Established | Mid-12th century |
Disestablished | 1537/8 |
Dedicated to | Leonard of Noblac |
Diocese | Diocese of Coventry and Lichfield |
Controlled churches |
Montford, Shropshire Tibshelf Bold |
People | |
Founder(s) | Unknown |
Important associated figures |
|
Site | |
Location | Near Brewood |
Coordinates | 52°39′57″N 2°15′30″W / 52.6657°N 2.2584°WCoordinates: 52°39′57″N 2°15′30″W / 52.6657°N 2.2584°W |
Visible remains | Substantial remains of priory church. |
Public access | Yes |
Other information | Accessible all year at all reasonable times. A short walk from a minor road. |
White Ladies Priory (often Whiteladies Priory), once the Priory of St Leonard at Brewood, was an English priory of Augustinian canonesses, now in ruins, in Shropshire, in the parish of Boscobel, some eight miles (13 km) northwest of Wolverhampton, near Junction 3 of the M54 motorway. Dissolved in 1536, it became famous for its role in the escape of Charles II of England after the Battle of Worcester in 1651. The name 'White Ladies' refers to the canonesses who lived there and who wore white religious habits.
The origins and exact date of foundation of the priory are not known: the latter part of the 12th century is generally accepted as the period of establishment. The surviving ruins show work typical of the late 12th century, and the first documentary evidence dates from 1186 or earlier. In it, Emma, daughter of Reynold of Pulverbatch, in the process of giving land to Haughmond Abbey mentions that she has already granted a virgate of land in Beobridge to the white nuns of Brewood. The publication of this information by the important Shropshire historian Robert William Eyton in 1856 directly contradicted his own conviction, published only a year earlier, of a date in the reigns of Richard I of England or John, as well as casting into doubt older traditions linking the priory with Archbishop Hubert Walter. Eyton thought the priory a Cistercian house, which is now known to be incorrect, but his documentary research still gives the earliest known date by which it must have been founded.