Environment Court
| Environment Court of New Zealand | |
|---|---|
| Te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa (Māori) | |
 |
|
| Established | 1996 |
| Location | Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch |
| Authorized by | Resource Management Act 1991 |
| Decisions are appealed to | High Court of New Zealand |
| Website | www |
| Principal Environment Court Judge | |
| Currently | Judge L J Newhook |
| Since | 2011 |
The Environment Court of New Zealand (Māori: Te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa) is a specialist court for plans, resource consents and environmental issues. It mainly deals with issues arising under the Resource Management Act, meaning that it covers a wide range of potential future effects of planning applications, which can include such areas as traffic congestion, noise/pollution emissions and social and commercial consequences, rather than just the 'ecological' aspects that could be implied by the 'environmental' term.
The history of independent appeal courts addressing environmental matters began with the establishment of Appeal Boards under the Town and Country Planning Act 1953. The first planning appeals were heard in February 1955. The Appeal Boards were replaced by the Planning Tribunal following the passing of the Town and Country Planning Act 1977.
The Environment Court replaced the Planning Tribunal as a result of the Resource Management Amendment Act 1996.
The Environment Court has a substantially larger role than the Planning Tribunal, with expanded functions and powers over planning, resource consents and enforcement. Virtually all important processes and decisions under the Resource Management Act 1991, such as regional policy statements, regional and district plans, resource consents and water conservation orders, may be appealed to the Environment Court.
In particular, the Environment Court hears appeals on decisions on applications for resource consent on a 'de novo' basis. The Environment Court does not review the decision: it hears any evidence it requires and makes its own decision, which replaces that of the local authority. It focuses on "the merits and substance of the particular decision at issue, not the deliberative process of the executive authority that made the initial decision."
...
Wikipedia