Digital divide
| 2005 | 2010 | 2014a | |
| World population | 6.5 billion | 6.9 billion | 7.2 billion |
| Not using the Internet | 84% | 70% | 60% |
| Using the Internet | 16% | 30% | 40% |
| Users in the developing world | 8% | 21% | 32% |
| Users in the developed world | 51% | 67% | 78% |
| a Estimate. Source: International Telecommunications Union. |
|||
| 2005 | 2010 | 2014a | |
| Africa | 2% | 10% | 19% |
| Americas | 36% | 49% | 65% |
| Arab States | 8% | 26% | 41% |
| Asia and Pacific | 9% | 23% | 32% |
| Commonwealth of Independent States |
10% |
34% |
56% |
| Europe | 46% | 67% | 75% |
| a Estimate. Source: International Telecommunications Union. |
|||
| 2007 | 2010 | 2014a | |
| World population | 6.6 billion | 6.9 billion | 7.2 billion |
| Fixed broadband | 5% | 8% | 10% |
| Developing world | 2% | 4% | 6% |
| Developed world | 18% | 24% | 27% |
| Mobile broadband | 4% | 11% | 32% |
| Developing world | 1% | 4% | 21% |
| Developed world | 19% | 43% | 84% |
| a Estimate. Source: International Telecommunications Union. |
|||
| Fixed subscriptions: | 2007 | 2010 | 2014a |
| Africa | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Americas | 11% | 14% | 17% |
| Arab States | 1% | 2% | 3% |
| Asia and Pacific | 3% | 6% | 8% |
| Commonwealth of Independent States |
2% |
8% |
14% |
| Europe | 18% | 24% | 28% |
| Mobile subscriptions: | 2007 | 2010 | 2014a |
| Africa | 0.2% | 2% | 19% |
| Americas | 6% | 23% | 59% |
| Arab States | 0.8% | 5% | 25% |
| Asia and Pacific | 3% | 7% | 23% |
| Commonwealth of Independent States |
0.2% |
22% |
49% |
| Europe | 15% | 29% | 64% |
| a Estimate. Source: International Telecommunications Union. |
|||
A digital divide is an economic and social inequality with regard to access to, use of, or impact of information and communication technologies (ICT). The divide within countries (such as the digital divide in the United States) may refer to inequalities between individuals, households, businesses, or geographic areas, usually at different socioeconomic levels or other demographic categories. The divide between differing countries or regions of the world is referred to as the global digital divide, examining this technological gap between developing and developed countries on an international scale.
The term digital divide describes a gap in terms of access to and usage of information and communication technology. It was traditionally considered to be a question of having or not having access, but with a global mobile phone penetration of over 95%, it is becoming a relative inequality between those who have more and less bandwidth and more or less skills. Conceptualizations of the digital divide have been described as "who, with which characteristics, connects how to what":
Different authors focus on different aspects, which leads to a large variety of definitions of the digital divide. "For example, counting with only 3 different choices of subjects (individuals, organizations, or countries), each with 4 characteristics (age, wealth, geography, sector), distinguishing between 3 levels of digital adoption (access, actual usage and effective adoption), and 6 types of technologies (fixed phone, mobile... Internet...), already results in 3x4x3x6 = 216 different ways to define the digital divide. Each one of them seems equally reasonable and depends on the objective pursued by the analyst".
The infrastructure by which individuals, households, businesses, and communities connect to the Internet address the physical mediums that people use to connect to the Internet such as desktop computers, laptops, basic mobile phones or smart phones, iPods or other MP3 players, gaming consoles such as Xbox or PlayStation, electronic book readers, and tablets such as iPads.
Traditionally the nature of the divide has been measured in terms of the existing numbers of subscriptions and digital devices. Given the increasing number of such devices, some have concluded that the digital divide among individuals has increasingly been closing as the result of a natural and almost automatic process. Others point to persistent lower levels of connectivity among women, racial and ethnic minorities, people with lower incomes, rural residents, and less educated people as evidence that addressing inequalities in access to and use of the medium will require much more than the passing of time. Recent studies have measured the digital divide not in terms of technological devices, but in terms of the existing bandwidth per individual (in kbit/s per capita). As shown in the Figure on the side, the digital divide in kbit/s is not monotonically decreasing, but re-opens up with each new innovation. For example, "the massive diffusion of narrow-band Internet and mobile phones during the late 1990s" increased digital inequality, as well as "the initial introduction of broadband DSL and cable modems during 2003–2004 increased levels of inequality". This is because a new kind of connectivity is never introduced instantaneously and uniformly to society as a whole at once, but diffuses slowly through social networks. As shown by the Figure, during the mid-2000s, communication capacity was more unequally distributed than during the late 1980s, when only fixed-line phones existed. The most recent increase in digital equality stems from the massive diffusion of the latest digital innovations (i.e. fixed and mobile broadband infrastructures, e.g. 3G and fiber optics FTTH). Measurement methodologies of the digital divide, and more specifically an Integrated Iterative Approach General Framework (Integrated Contextual Iterative Approach – ICI) and the digital divide modeling theory under measurement model DDG (Digital Divide Gap) are used to analyze the gap existing between developed and developing countries, and the gap among the 27 members-states of the European Union.
...
Wikipedia