Condottieri-class cruiser Raimondo Montecuccoli at Venice
|
|
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name: | Condottieri class |
Operators: | |
Subclasses: |
|
Built: | 1928–1937 |
In commission: | 1931–1972 |
Completed: | 12 |
Lost: | 6 |
Retired: | 6 |
General characteristics | |
Type: | Light cruiser |
Displacement: |
|
Length: | 169.3–187 m (555–614 ft) |
Beam: | 15.5–18.9 m (51–62 ft) |
Draught: | 5.2–6.9 m (17–23 ft) |
Propulsion: |
|
Speed: | 34–37 knots (63–69 km/h; 39–43 mph) |
Complement: | 507–640 |
Armament: | |
Aircraft carried: | 2–4 × reconnaissance floatplanes |
The Condottieri class was a sequence of five, different, light cruiser classes of the Regia Marina (Italian Navy), although these classes show a clear line of evolution. They were built before World War II to gain predominance in the Mediterranean Sea. The ships were named after military commanders (condottieri) of Italian history.
Each class is known after the first ship of the group:
Cadorna class:
Montecuccoli class:
Duca d'Aosta class:
Duca degli Abruzzi class:
The first group, the four Di Giussanos, were built to counter the French large contre-torpilleurs, and therefore they featured very high speed, in exchange of virtually no armour protection. The two Cadornas retained the main characteristics, with minor improvements to stability and hull strength.
Major changes were introduced for the next pair, the Montecuccolis. About 2000 tons heavier, they had significantly better protection, and upgraded power-plants to maintain the required high speed. The two Duca d'Aostas continued the trend, thickening the armour and improving the power plant again.
The final pair, the Duca degli Abruzzis completed the transition, sacrificing a little speed for good protection (whose scheme was the same of the Zara-class heavy cruisers) and for ten (instead of eight) 6-inch /55 guns.
All ships served in the Mediterranean during World War II.
The ships of the first two subclasses (with the exception of Luigi Cadorna) were all lost by 1942, primarily to enemy torpedoes (with Bartolomeo Colleoni sunk by destroyers at the Battle of Cape Spada after being crippled by HMAS Sydney, Alberico da Barbiano and Alberto da Giussano suffering a similar fate at the Battle of Cape Bon, and Armando Diaz sunk by a submarine), which led to many authors (including Preston) to question their real value as fighting ships. However, the subsequent vessels fared considerably better with all, except Muzio Attendolo (sunk by an Allied bombing in December 1942), surviving the war.