Baron Franz von Pillersdorf

Hochwohlgeboren Franz Freiherr von Pillersdorf
Baron Franz von Pillersdorf, lithograph by Josef Kriehuber, 1848
3rd Minister-President of the Austrian Empire
In office 4 May 1848 – 8 July 1848
Monarch	Ferdinand I
Preceded by	Karl Ludwig Reichsgraf von Ficquelmont
Succeeded by	Anton Feirherr von Doblhoff-Dier
Interior Minister of the Austrian Empire
In office 20 March 1848 – 8 July 1848
Monarch	Ferdinand I
Prime Minister	Franz Anton Graf von Kolowrat-Liebsteinsky (March–April) Count Karl Ludwig von Ficquelmont (April–May)
Preceded by	Franz Anton Graf von Kolowrat-Liebsteinsky
Succeeded by	Anton Feirherr von Doblhoff-Dier
Personal details
Born	(1786-03-01)1 March 1786 Brno, Moravia
Died	22 February 1862(1862-02-22) (aged 75) Vienna, Austria
Religion	Roman Catholic Church

Baron Franz von Pillersdorf (1 March 1786 – 22 February 1862) was an Austrian statesman.

Born in Brno the son of a judge, Pillersdorf after a legal education in Vienna in 1805 started his public service career in Galicia. In 1807, he returned to Vienna as assistant to the court councillor Baron von Baldacci. This put him in the centre of the action when the war with Napoleon broke out. In the disadvantageous peace according to the 1809 Treaty of Schönbrunn that followed, the Austrian foreign minister Johann Philipp Stadion had to resign and a new ministry was formed, with Prince Metternich at its head. Baldacci moved to the periphery of power, but Pillersdorff advanced to court secretary and then became a court councillor. Here Pillersdorff had ample opportunity to acquaint himself with the great disarray in the operation of the Austrian state, and how necessary reform was, but uncommonly difficult to implement.

The events of 1812-1815 increased the oppressive political climate still more. Baldacci became minister of the army and headed the administration of the occupied zones in France, and Pillersdorf was put at his side. Pillersdorf's stay in France and travels to the United Kingdom gave him the opportunity to make comparative studies and think about how the people could start participating in lawmaking and government in Austria as well. But the time had not come for such changes in Austria since Emperor Francis of Habsburg kept the reins of power tightly to himself.

After the Napoleonic Wars, Austrian finances urgently required attention. The paper money issued amounted to 700 million fl., but at least a portion of this disappeared from circulation and was replaced by specie. By 1830 there was even the prospect of a surplus in the treasury. This situation brought to the fore the question of whether or not government should be representative, for to maintain the partially achieved financial order, the participation of the public in financial management was needed, as well as confidence that the ministries would not overstep their budgets. The future of Austria lay in the solution of this question, for the financial element comprised much more important affairs. But those near the throne did not want to see the solution of the financial question turn into a question of a constitution — yet that was its essence.