*** Welcome to piglix ***

Abercrombie class monitor

HMS Abercrombie July 1915 right broadside AWM G01083.jpeg
The starboard profile of HMS Abercrombie off Gallipoli in July 1915
Class overview
Name: Abercrombie
Operators:  Royal Navy
Completed: Four
Lost: One
General characteristics
Type: Monitor
Displacement: 6,150 long tons (6,250 t)
Length: 334 ft 6 in (101.96 m) oa
Beam: 90 ft 2 in (27.48 m)
Draught: 10 ft (3.0 m)
Installed power: 2,310 ihp (1,720 kW)
Propulsion:
  • 2 × vertical triple expansion reciprocating engines,
  • 2 × boilers,
  • 2 × screws (HMS Raglan)
Speed: 6 12 kn (12.0 km/h; 7.5 mph) (HMS Raglan)
Complement: 198
Armament:
Armour:
Aircraft carried: 1 × seaplane (designed but seldom carried)

The Abercrombie class of monitors served in the Royal Navy during the First World War.

The four ships in this class came about when the contracted supplier of the main armament for the Greek battleship Salamis being built in Germany was unable to supply due to the British blockade. The company – Bethlehem Steel in the United States – instead offered to sell the four 14 in (356 mm) twin gun turrets to the Royal Navy on 3 November 1914. The Royal Navy was using obsolete pre-dreadnought battleships for shore bombardment in support of the army in Belgium, and a design for a shallow-draught warship (known as "Monitors") suitable for shore-bombardment was quickly designed and built to use these turrets. The ships were laid down and launched within six months.

The ships carried a single main gun turret forward of a tripod mast, which was itself in front of a single funnel. A secondary armament of two 12-pounder (76 mm) guns was fitted, with a single 3-pounder (47 mm) anti-aircraft gun and a 2-pounder pom-pom completed the ships armament.

The monitors had a box-like hull, with very bluff bow and stern, and were fitted with anti-torpedo bulges. In order to speed construction, it was intended to use off-the shelf merchant ship engines, giving about 2,000 indicated horsepower (1,500 kW), which were expected to drive the ships to 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph). The rushed design, however, meant that the ships were much slower than expected — Raglan's engines gave 2,310 indicated horsepower (1,720 kW) but the ship could only reach 6 12 knots (12.0 km/h; 7.5 mph).


...
Wikipedia

...