1st Libyan Division Sibille | |
---|---|
Active | 1939–1941 |
Country | Italy |
Branch | Italian Army |
Type | Infantry |
Size | Division |
Nickname(s) | Sibille |
Engagements | World War II |
The 1st Libyan Division Sibille was an Infantry Division of the Italian Army during World War II.
Originally called in the 1920s with the name Italian Libyan Colonial Division. This was a formation of colonial troops raised by the Italians in their colony in Libya and participated in the invasion of Ethiopia in the Second Italo-Abyssinian War.
This formation was reorganized into the "1st Libyan Infantry Division Sibille" by the beginning of Italy's entry into World War II. It had 7224 men (mostly native Libyans). There was even a "Regiment Libyan Paratroopers", that was formed mainly by the Libyan Paratrooper Battalion "Fanti dell’Aria" (with a strength of 500 paratroopers, organized in four companies).
In September 1940, the 1st Libyan Division (commanded by general Sibille and named after him) participated in the Italian invasion of Egypt. By December, the division was dug in at Maktila near Sidi Barrani and was forced to surrender after heavy fighting during Operation Compass.
Indeed, on September 13 the entire 1st Libyan Division, including a regiment of Libyan paratroopers attacked Sollum on the Egyptian northern coast, held by platoons of Coldstream Guards. The British laid mines in the area and quickly withdrew to Marsa Matruh after suffering 50 casualties.
In December the British started a counter-offensive. The Arabs and paratroopers of 1st Libyan Division fought hard on the December 10, 1940, amid a howling sandstorm, until on December 11 the division began to disintegrate with heavy losses.
Some units of Libyan paratroopers were able to reach Tobruk in Italian Libya, after a long march in the desert. The Division was not recreated in the following years, because of direct orders from Rommel (who did not appreciate the use of Libyan colonial troops, and believed that the Italian defeat in Egypt in December 1940 was due mainly to excessive use of these colonial troops ).