Wikipedia:NODEADLINE

We can afford to take our time, to consider matters, to wait before creating a new article until its significance is unambiguously established.

Above all, creating an article without establishing the basis of the content and its significance is a bad idea. There really are no points for being first; being the author of the best and most neutral content will earn you far greater kudos.

We can afford to take our time to improve articles, to wait before deleting a new article unless its potential significance cannot be established.

Remember also that consensus can change over time. New people may bring fresh ideas, established users may change their minds when new things come up, and we all may find a better way to do things.

Editors shouldn't get upset when they lose the opportunity to create a new article. No one owns an article that hasn't even been written yet. When you miss out on a chance to create a new article, instead of feeling robbed or slighted or considering acts of vengeance, you might look and see if there's any way you can still contribute. Maybe there are grammatical errors or typos you can correct, or you have text you could add.

...
Wikipedia