Wikipedia:COIN

Article deleted at . Editor indeffed. (non-admin closure) --Lemongirl942 () 14:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

The username suggests it is used by two people (Opang and Metsubo Jamir), that created 10 of the 36 sources of the article. The remaining sources appear like they are not independent. The article is about one of the two people operating the account, that allegedly won a contest, whose article was deleted for lack of notability. I've started an AfD to delete the article and I've got already 1 vote for delete, that stated the account was a "WP:SPA", i.e. a single purpose account. The "single purpose" of the account is creating an autobiography, and this is a conflict of interest. Luis150902 ( | ) 15:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

References

ArchitectureNerd ( ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  · ), based on the articles created, seems to be a paid editor. What's baffling is the edit histories, which seem to a show a chain of moves from sandbox to a series of new and unrelated titles. Can anyone tell me what's going on there?

In any case, the articles in question are:

--Calton | 12:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Nope, not buying it. It's an assembly-line process that also serves to obscure the creation of new articles. For a new editor, you've gotten pretty good at cranking out a series of low-notability, thinly sourced, puffed-up, and promotional articles on an odd assortment of topics: a marijuana activist and her organization, two blogs, an interior decorator, and a California property-sales website specializing in Chinese properties. --Calton | 03:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

My previous investigation into the years of COI editing led to the page being significantly scaled back by editors. I since noticed the editing allegations have since been disputed, however this seems unlikely to me when they are reviewed both individually and contextually. Since then, significant edits have restored the content without COI being disclosed. Deku-shrub () 12:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

...
Wikipedia