United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
| United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces | |
|---|---|
 |
|
| Established | 1951 |
| Country | United States of America |
| Location | Washington, D.C. |
| Coordinates | 38°53′45″N 77°01′06″W / 38.8958°N 77.0183°WCoordinates: 38°53′45″N 77°01′06″W / 38.8958°N 77.0183°W |
| Composition method | Presidential nomination with confirmation by the Senate |
| Authorized by | 10 U.S.C. §§ 941–946 (U.C.M.J. Subchapter XII, Art. 141–146) |
| Judge term length | 15 years |
| Number of positions | Five |
| Website | armfor.uscourts.gov |
| Chief Judge | |
| Currently | Charles E. Erdmann |
| Since | 2015 |
The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) is an Article I court that exercises worldwide appellate jurisdiction over members of the United States Armed Forces on active duty and other persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The court is composed of five civilian judges appointed for 15-year terms by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the United States Senate. The court reviews decisions from the intermediate appellate courts of the services: the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, the Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, and the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals.
Courts-martial are judicial proceedings conducted by the armed forces. The Continental Congress first authorized the use of courts-martial in 1775. From the time of the American Revolutionary War through the middle of the twentieth century, courts-martial were governed by the Articles of War and the Articles for the Government of the Navy. Congress's authority "To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces" is contained in the United States Constitution at Article I, Section 8.
Until 1920, court-martial convictions were reviewed either by a commander in the field or by the President, depending on the severity of the sentence or the rank of the accused. The absence of formal review received critical attention during World War I, and the Army created an internal legal review process for a limited number of cases. Following the war, in the Act of June 4, 1920, Congress required the Army to establish boards of review, consisting of three lawyers, to consider cases involving death, dismissal of an officer, an unsuspended dishonorable discharge, or confinement in a penitentiary, with limited exceptions. The legislation further required legal review of other cases in the Office of the Judge Advocate General.
...
Wikipedia