"The Right to Know" | |
---|---|
Yes Minister episode | |
Episode no. |
Series 1 Episode 6 |
Written by |
Antony Jay Jonathan Lynn |
Produced by | Sydney Lotterby |
Original air date | 31 March 1980 |
Guest appearance(s) | |
John Savident
Diana Hoddinott
Gerry Cowper
"The Right to Know" is the sixth episode of the BBC comedy series Yes Minister and was first broadcast 31 March 1980. This was one of few episodes during the show's run which did not end with the trademark phrase "Yes Minister".
Sir Humphrey Appleby is in his office, where he is joined by Bernard. Sir Humphrey wishes to know why several "underlings" have attended certain of Jim Hacker's recent meetings. Bernard informs him that their purpose is to brief the Minister on departmental procedure. Sir Humphrey demands that this ceases immediately, as there is a possibility that the Minister may learn something of which his senior officials are unaware and undermine their authority. The Permanent Secretary is concerned that Hacker is starting to run the department — a recipe for chaos and innovation. He states that a minister has just three functions: to act as the department's PR man, to steer its legislation through Parliament, and to fight for its budget. He instructs Bernard to "create activity" in Hacker's diary. Bernard protests that the Minister is at that moment seeing a deputation of environmentalists regarding an endangered colony of badgers. While pleased at this, Sir Humphrey warns Bernard that Principal Private Secretaries may join the badgers as a threatened species if they are unable to occupy their ministers.
Meanwhile, Hacker is doing his best to placate his visitors, who are concerned that new legislation will allow certain areas of the countryside to lose their protected status, in particular the aforementioned badger colony at a place called Hayward's Spinney. After Bernard ushers them out, and Sir Humphrey joins them, Hacker is livid. His announcements to parliament and the press had proclaimed that the legislation would mean "no loss of amenity", and now he has discovered that this is not the case. Sir Humphrey indicates that the actual wording was "no significant loss of amenity", which apparently makes all the difference. He is able to persuade Hacker that Hayward's Spinney is not significant and therefore he should have nothing to worry about. However, Hacker presses the point that he should have been informed. He is surprised by Sir Humphrey's explanation, that "there are some things it is better for a minister not to know." His Permanent Secretary goes on to clarify that Hacker would not have made such a convincing case for the legislation had he been lobbied by the environmentalists beforehand. Nevertheless, the Minister is unimpressed and tells Sir Humphrey that he is about to announce a re-organisation to ensure that it doesn't happen again. Sir Humphrey is incensed and (eventually) tells Hacker that the incumbent minister is not there to run the department; he re-iterates a minister's responsibilities as defined to Bernard earlier. Hacker is not having any of it: he wants access to all departmental paperwork from now on.