Sir William Cusack-Smith, 2nd Baronet
| Sir William Cusack Smith, 2nd Baronet | |
|---|---|
| Member, Irish House of Commons | |
|
In office 1794–1801 |
|
| Constituency |
Lanesborough Donegal Borough |
| Solicitor-General for Ireland | |
|
In office 1800–1801 |
|
| Baron of the Exchequer | |
|
In office 1801–1836 |
|
| Personal details | |
| Born | 23 January 1766 |
| Died | 21 August 1836 |
| Spouse(s) | Hester Berry |
Sir William Cusack-Smith, 2nd Baronet FRS (23 January 1766 – 21 August 1836) was an Irish baronet, politician, and judge.
Cusack-Smith was the eldest son of Sir Michael Smith,1st Baronet, Master of the Rolls in Ireland from 1801 to 1806, and his first wife Maryanne Cusack. He was educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford.
Cusack-Smith was called to the Irish Bar in 1788 and made Solicitor-General for Ireland in 1800. He was appointed a Baron of the Exchequer in 1801 at the remarkably early age of 35. The appointment caused some protest, both because of his youth and because he was already displaying signs of eccentricity. In April 1805 he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society.
He was an eccentric judge who offended Daniel O'Connell. O'Connell raised a motion, carried by MPs on 13 February 1834, to appoint a select committee to enquire into the conduct of Lord Smith in respect of his neglect of duty as a judge, and the introduction of political topics in his charges to grand juries. On the count of neglect, Cusack-Smith had been accused of rarely beginning his court sessions until after noon, occasionally running them until late into the night. The accusation of introducing political topics stemmed from statements made from the bench to grand juries condemning partisan agitation practices that were, that were themselves perceived as inflammatory due to their one-sided nature. On 21 February there was an important debate on the matter, and the resolution to appoint the committee was rescinded by a majority of six.
Cusack-Smith was a lifelong supporter of Catholic Emancipation (his mother was a Roman Catholic), but moved from early rejection of the Act of Union to supporting it. Despite this reversal, his conscientious conduct as a judge was well thought of to the extent that he was even congratulated by voices among the Repealers movement on his escape from parliamentary inquiry.
...
Wikipedia