Rhode Island v. Massachusetts | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Decided February 21, 1838 | |
Full case name | The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainants v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant |
Citations | 37 U.S. 657 (more)
9 L. Ed. 1233; 1838 U.S. LEXIS 372
|
Holding | |
Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over a suit by one state against another over their shared border | |
Court membership | |
|
|
Case opinions | |
Dissent | Taney |
Story took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 657 (1838), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court asserted its original jurisdiction over a suit in equity by one state against another over their shared border. The case involved a boundary dispute between Massachusetts and Rhode Island dating back to colonial times. Daniel Webster was involved in the case representing Massachusetts.