R. v. City of Sault Ste-Marie
| R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) | |
|---|---|
|
|
| Hearing: October 13, 14, 1977 Judgment: May 1, 1978 |
|
| Full case name | City of Sault Ste. Marie v. Her Majesty The Queen |
| Citations | [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299 |
| Court Membership | |
|
Chief Justice: Bora Laskin Puisne Justices: Ronald Martland, Roland Ritchie, Wishart Spence, Louis-Philippe Pigeon, Brian Dickson, Jean Beetz, Willard Estey, Yves Pratte |
|
| Reasons given | |
| Unanimous reasons by | Dickson J. |
R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299 is a Supreme Court of Canada case where the Court defines the three types of offences that exist in Canadian criminal law and further defines the justification for "public welfare" offences.
The city of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario hired Cherokee Disposal to dispose of the city's waste. The city built a disposal site 20 feet from a stream which, when filled by the disposal company, resulted in waste seeping into the stream. The city was charged with discharging, or permitting to be discharged, refuse into the public waterways causing pollution pursuant to section 32(1) of the Ontario Water Resources Act.
The issue before the court was whether the city's offence should be classified as strict liability or absolute liability. The Court of Appeal for Ontario held that the charge required proof of mens rea which on the facts would acquit the defendant.
In the judgement written by Chief Justice Dickson, the Court recognized three categories of offences:
To distinguish between these types the Court examines:
The Court then noted that the dumping offences were of a public welfare nature and were from a provincial statute, thus, were Strict Liability offences and do not require mens rea.
...
Wikipedia