Private Guns, Public Health
.jpg) |
|
| Author | David Hemenway |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Subject | Gun politics, Gun violence |
| Genre | Non-fiction |
| Publisher | University of Michigan Press |
Private Guns, Public Health is a 2004 policy opinion book by David Hemenway, an economist who has served as Professor of Health Policy at the Harvard School of Public Health as well as the Director of Harvard's Injury Control Research Center. He argues that the widespread ownership of firearms in private hands in the U.S. promotes the spread of the "disease" of gun violence, and he takes a collective interpretation of the Second Amendment while stating that increased regulations are absolutely necessary in the purposes of public safety. Hemenway makes the central case that "more guns in a community lead to more homicide". He published the book through the University of Michigan Press in 2004.
Hemenway interprets the issues of gun violence and gun politics in the U.S. through a public health lens, which he believes "emphasizes prevention rather than fault-finding, blame, or revenge." He writes that he is not "anti-gun" or "anti-gun owner" any more than people who advocate for consumer safety measures in cars are "anti-cars." He sums the goal of the book up as "injury prevention".
He states that no "credible evidence exists for a general deterrent effect of firearms" since "arming citizens to reduce crime- in the home, in schools, or on the streets- seems likely to increase rather than reduce the level of lethal violence". He also asserts that "the safety of guns is less regulated than virtually any other commodity". Overall, he remarks, "We should no longer accept our high levels of lethal violence as an inevitable by-product of a free American society."
He specifically criticizes the work of academic researchers John Lott, Jr. and Gary Kleck, both of which have published criminological studies finding no reason to think that the spread of guns leads to more crime. Hemenway argues as well that the correct interpretation of the Second Amendment is that "rights should be determined and disputes resolved not through private judgment of each individual backed by private force but rather by the public judgment of the community." He criticizes the mythos of American frontier individualism as separate from the reality of "a hired hand with a borrowed horse, a mean streak, and syphilis".
...
Wikipedia