*** Welcome to piglix ***

Ladder interview


A ladder interview is an interviewing technique where a seemingly simple response to a question is pushed by the interviewer in order to find subconscious motives. This method is also very popular for many businesses when conducting research to understand the product elements personal values for end user.

It begins with a simple question, and then another question is asked about that response. For example, an interviewer may ask: "How come you skipped class?" and the response may be: "I went out with my friends". The next question would be something like "Why did you go out with your friends?". Essentially, the format is as follows:

The first responses are generally functional justifications, like "I went out with my friends because I wanted some pizza", or "I wanted some pizza because I used to eat it as a child"; but eventually the interviewer hopes to reach a virtue justification like "It's good to be childish". Then it is fair to conclude that the interviewee skipped class because he valued childishness.

Thomas J. Reynolds and Jonathan Gutman were the founders and pioneers of the laddering theory.

This technique is used for marketing in order to see what values inspire the consumption of the particular product. A chocolate bar producer would do this test so they can match the most common terminal virtue to their product in an advertisement. For example, the virtue of justice, or a virtue of , or in the above example, the virtue of childhood.

The Laddering technique allows businesses get to know their customers better by asking them simple direct questions.

In the beginning of the interview process, the interviewer should build good rapport with the interviewee. Making the respondent aware there will not be judged for their right and wrong answers. By adapting this technique of environment the purpose of the laddering interview can be accomplished.

Before getting into this specifics of interviewing techniques, it is important to identify the problems associated with laddering. The two most common problems are outlined below.

When a question is asked as to why a particular reasoning is important to them the person been asked the questions in most cases does not necessarily have a valid response.

As the interviewee is taken through the laddering process the questions asked become more of a personal nature. As the questions continue the respondent does not necessarily answer the questions being asked correctly, instead any answer is given which may not relate to the topic. One of the reasons could be avoidance.


...
Wikipedia

...