*** Welcome to piglix ***

Kyrgyz parliamentary election, 2015

Kyrgyz parliamentary election, 2015
Kyrgyzstan
← 2010 4 October 2015 (2015-10-04) Next →

All 120 seats to the Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan
61 seats needed for a majority
Turnout 1,626,255 (58.89%)
  First party Second party Third party
  2012-03-20 Almazbek Atambayev.jpeg Omurbek Babanov, October 2011.jpeg
Leader Almazbek Atambaev Omurbek Babanov Kanatbek Isaev
Party SDPK Respublika–Ata Zhurt Kyrgyzstan Party
Last election 26 23 new party
Seats won 38 28 18
Seat change Increase 12 Decrease 23 Increase 18
Popular vote 435,804 320,115 206,094
Percentage 27.35% 20.08% 12.93%

Kyrgyzstan 2015.png
Map of the election results by regions

Prime Minister before election

Temir Sariyev
Independent

Elected Prime Minister

Sooronbay Jeenbekov
Independent


Temir Sariyev
Independent

Sooronbay Jeenbekov
Independent

Parliamentary elections were held in Kyrgyzstan on 4 October 2015.

The 120 seats in the Supreme Council were elected by proportional representation in a single nationwide constituency, with an electoral threshold of 7%. No party is allowed to hold more than 65 seats. Party lists were required to have at least 30% of the candidates from each gender, and every fourth candidate had to be of a different gender. Each list was also required to have at least 15% of the candidates being from ethnic minorities.

Biometric voter registration was introduced following claims of vote rigging in previous elections.

Several political parties were formed in the run-up to the elections, often as an attempt by wealthy Kyrgyz to further their own interests. Incumbent Prime Minister Temir Sariyev claimed that places on party lists were sold to bidders, with rumours circulating that a high place on a party's list cost between $500,000 and £1,000,000.

Over 10% of prospective candidates were prevented from running due to criminal convictions, whilst one party's leader, a former boxer, was banned after it was claimed they beat up a rival candidate.

Although there were some reports of voter fraud, the OSCE mission stated that the elections had been "lively and competitive" and "unique in this region", whilst the PACE mission stated that voters had "made their choice freely among a large number of contestants."

However, the OSCE noted problems with the biometric voter registration, with many people not having registered in time to receive their ID cards. The Council of Europe raised concerns regarding transparency of campaigns and party financing, stating that it should be improved.


...
Wikipedia

...