Korematsu v. United States
| Korematsu v. United States | |
|---|---|
|
|
| Argued October 11–12, 1944 Decided December 18, 1944 |
|
| Full case name | Fred Korematsu vs. United States |
| Citations | 323 U.S. 214 (more)
65 S. Ct. 193; 89 L. Ed. 194; 1944 U.S. LEXIS 1341
|
| Prior history | Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Holding | |
| The exclusion order leading to Japanese American Internment was constitutional. | |
| Court membership | |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Black, joined by Stone, Reed, Douglas, Rutledge, Frankfurter |
| Concurrence | Frankfurter |
| Dissent | Roberts |
| Dissent | Murphy |
| Dissent | Jackson |
| Laws applied | |
| Executive Order 9066; U.S. Const. amend. V | |
Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps during World War II regardless of citizenship.
In a 6–3 decision, the Court sided with the government, ruling that the exclusion order was constitutional. Six of eight Roosevelt appointees sided with Roosevelt. The lone Republican appointee, Owen Roberts, dissented. The opinion, written by Supreme Court justice Hugo Black, held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed Fred Korematsu's individual rights, and the rights of Americans of Japanese descent. (The Court limited its decision to the validity of the exclusion orders, adding, "The provisions of other orders requiring persons of Japanese ancestry to report to assembly centers and providing for the detention of such persons in assembly and relocation centers were separate, and their validity is not in issue in this proceeding.") During the case, Solicitor General Charles Fahy is alleged to have suppressed evidence by keeping from the Court a report from the Office of Naval Intelligence indicating that there was no evidence that Japanese Americans were acting as spies or sending signals to enemy submarines.
The decision in Korematsu v. United States has been controversial. Korematsu's conviction for evading internment was overturned on November 10, 1983, after Korematsu challenged the earlier decision by filing for a writ of coram nobis. In a ruling by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the writ (that is, it voided Korematsu's original conviction) because in Korematsu's original case, the government had knowingly submitted false information to the Supreme Court that had a material effect on the Supreme Court's decision.
...
Wikipedia