John Edward Parsons
| John Edward Parsons | |
|---|---|
(1910)
|
|
| Born |
October 24, 1829 New York City |
| Died | February 16, 1915 (aged 85) |
| Nationality | United States |
| Education | New York University |
| Occupation | lawyer |
| Title | President of the New York City Bar Association |
| Term | 1900-1901 |
| Predecessor | James C. Carter |
| Successor | William Gardner Choate |
| Parent(s) | Edward Lamb Matilda Parsons |
John Edward Parsons (October 24, 1829 – January 16, 1915) was a lawyer in New York City. He was president of the New York City Bar Association from 1900 to 1901.
Parsons was born in New York City in 1829 to Edward Lamb and Matilda Parsons. His father was English and his mother was descended from a prominent Wallingford, Connecticut family. He was educated at New York University, where he earned a B.A. in 1848 and an M.A. in 1851. He also received an honorary M.A. from Yale Law School. and was admitted to the bar in 1851 or 1852.
Parsons began his legal career as the New York County Assistant District Attorney, where he managed many of the city’s prosecutions. This would be the only public position he would hold in his career. He was a founding member, and later president, of the New York City Bar Association and played an important role in the Bar’s prosecution of corrupt judges Albert Cardozo, John McCunn, D.P. Ingraham, and George Barnard. Later in his career, he started several practices, ultimately founding the firm Parsons, Closson & McIlvaine in 1902. His largest client was the American Sugar Refining Company, the precursor to the Domino Sugar company. In United States v. E. C. Knight Co., Parsons successfully defended American Sugar Refining from an anti-trust suit by the United States government, preserving its over $90 million in assets. In 1900, Parsons – who had said about trusts "I believe in trusts. They are economic necessities calculated to benefit the public" – was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury in Washington, D.C. for restraint of trade in trying to monopolize the sugar industry. The case did not go to trial until 1912, and a jury could not reach a unanimous decision.
...
Wikipedia