Jinasena
| Acharya Shri Jinasena | |
|---|---|
| जिनसेन | |
Image of a Digambara Acharya
|
|
| Religion | Jainism |
| Sect | Digambara |
| Personal | |
| Born | 783 AD |
| Died | 838 AD |
| Religious career | |
| Predecessor | Virasena |
| Disciple(s) | Amoghavarsha |
| Initiation | by Virasena |
Jinasena (8th century CE) was one of the several famous Digambara Acharya (head of a monastic order). He was the author of famous Jain texts like Harivamsa Purana and Mahapurana. He was the disciple of Acharya Virasena and he completed his teacher's famous commentary Dhavala on Ṣaṭkhaṅḍāgama, the most revered text in the Digambara tradition.
Jinasena was born in 783 AD. He died in 838 AD.
Rastrakuta king Amoghavarsha was his disciple.
Jinasena wrote Adipurana.Mahapurana includes Ādi purāṇa and Uttarapurana, the project was completed by his pupil Gunabhadra.
Mahapurana is the source of the famous quote:
Some foolish men declare that Creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created is ill-advised, and should be rejected. If god created the world, where was he before creation? If you say he was transcendent then, and needed no support, where is he now?
No single being had the skill to make the world - for how can an immaterial god create that which is material? How could god have made the world without any raw material? If you say he made this first, and then the world, you are face with an endless regression. If you declare that the raw material arose naturally you fall into another fallacy, for the whole universe might thus have been its own creator, and have risen equally naturally. If god created the world by an act of will, without any raw material, then it is just his will made nothing else and who will believe this silly stuff?
If he is ever perfect, and complete, how could the will to create have arisen in him? If, on the other hand, he is not perfect, he could no more create the universe than a potter could. If he is formless, actionless, and all-embracing, how could he have created the world? Such a soul, devoid of all modality, would have no desire to create anything. If you say that he created to no purpose, because it was his nature to do so then god is pointless.
...
Wikipedia