*** Welcome to piglix ***

HIP 11952

HIP 11952
Observation data
Epoch J2000      Equinox J2000
Constellation Cetus
Right ascension 02h 34m 11.04689s
Declination −12° 23′ 3.4570″
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.85
Characteristics
Spectral type F2V-IV
Apparent magnitude (B) 10.18
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.85
Apparent magnitude (J) 8.790
Apparent magnitude (H) 8.516
Apparent magnitude (K) 8.457
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv) 23.62 km/s
Proper motion (μ) RA: 57.27 mas/yr
Dec.: -187.74 mas/yr
Parallax (π) 8.93mas
Distance 376.1 ly
(115.3pc)
Details
Mass 0.83 ± 0.05 M
Radius 1.6 ± 0.1 R
Temperature 6040 ± 210 K
Metallicity [Fe/H] –1.95 ± 0.09 dex
Age 12.8 ± 2.6 Gyr
Other designations
LP 710-89, BD-13° 482, HD 16031, HIP 11952, NLTT 8361, PPM 211702, SAO 148474, TYC 5288-192-1
Database references
SIMBAD data

HIP 11952 is a star in the Milky Way galaxy, located 375 light-years away from the Sun. While the spectral lines strongly indicate that the star is of spectral type F2V-IV, previous analyses have stated that the star is a G8III giant star and an F0V main-sequence star. Located in the constellation Cetus, the star has a metallicity only 1% that of the Sun. It is nearing the end of its lifetime on the main sequence, and will soon begin the transition into a red giant.

In 2012 it was announced that HIP 11952 had two giant planets, this would have made it the oldest and most metal-poor planet host star known. This would have posed a challenge to planetary formation, as the chances of a planet forming so early in the Universe's history, with such a small amount of heavy elements with which to form planets, are believed to be remote.

Further measurements of HIP 11952 were made on 35 nights over about 150 days, from August 7, 2012 to January 6, 2013, using the newly installed high resolution spectrograph HARPS-N at the 3.58m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo telescope on La Palma Island (Canary Islands) and HARPS at the European Southern Observatory's 3.6m telescope on La Silla (Chile). Following their analysis, they were able to confidently exclude, through non-detection, the presence of the two giant planets with periods of 6.95 ± 0.01 days and 290.0 ± 16. 2 days. They also reasoned that the previously mistaken detections were probably due to instrument measurement errors. Re-analysis of the FEROS data revealed a problem with the barycentric correction used to derive the radial velocities, this error had led to the erroneous detection claim.


...
Wikipedia

...