Escape from Fort Bravo
| Escape from Fort Bravo | |
|---|---|
1953 Theatrical Poster
|
|
| Directed by | John Sturges |
| Produced by | Nicholas Nayfack |
| Written by |
Michael Pate Phillip Rock Frank Fenton |
| Starring |
William Holden Eleanor Parker John Forsythe |
| Music by | Jeff Alexander |
| Cinematography | Robert L. Surtees |
| Edited by | George Boemler |
| Distributed by | Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer |
|
Release date
|
|
|
Running time
|
98 minutes |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Budget | $1,520,000 |
| Box office | $3,158,000 |
Escape from Fort Bravo is a 1953 Anscocolor western film set during the American Civil War. It stars William Holden, Eleanor Parker, and John Forsythe.
Fort Bravo is a Union prison camp run by a strict Captain Roper (William Holden). A pretty woman named Carla Forester (Eleanor Parker) shows up to help free the prisoners, especially Confederate Captain John Marsh (John Forsythe). Roper falls in love with her (and she with him), so he has an additional motive to recapture the escapees. He does just that, but on the way back to the fort, they are attacked by fierce Mescalero Indians who are hostile to both sides and trapped in a shallow exposed depression. Roper frees and arms his prisoners, but even then, it looks like the Indians will wipe them out. Bailey (John Lupton) escapes to call for help. One by one, they are killed, including Campbell (William Demarest), Young (William Campbell), and the American Indian guide. Marsh and Lieutenant Beecher (Richard Anderson) are wounded. The next morning, to try to save Carla, Roper makes it look like he is the only one left alive and walks out in plain view. He is wounded, but the cavalry comes to the rescue just in time. Roper thanks Bailey for coming with help, while Marsh dies after smiling at Bailey.
The working titles of this film were Rope's End and Fort Bravo. Production dates: early April to late May 1953. Most of the film was shot on location in Gallup, NM and at Death Valley National Monument, CA.
At the time of the film's release, H.H.T. of The New York Times was unimpressed. While he found Sturges's direction full of "professional smoothness," he had many problems with Frank Fenton's "fuzzily defined" characters. The cast, he goes on, "seems confused throughout." Leonard Maltin disagrees, calling the film "well-executed" and awarding it three stars.
...
Wikipedia