Battle of Ipsus | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Wars of the Diadochi | |||||||
Lysimachus, one of the victors of Ipsus |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Antigonids |
Lysimachids Antipatrids Seleucids |
||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Antigonus I Monophthalmus † Demetrius Poliorcetes |
Lysimachus Seleucus I Nicator, Cassander Prepelaus Pleistarchus |
||||||
Strength | |||||||
70,000 infantry, 10,000 cavalry, 75 elephants |
64,000 infantry, 15,000 cavalry, 400 elephants, 100 scythed chariots |
The Battle of Ipsus (Ancient Greek: Ἱψός) was fought between some of the Diadochi (the successors of Alexander the Great) in 301 BC near the village of that name in Phrygia. Antigonus I Monophthalmus and his son Demetrius I of Macedon were pitted against the coalition of three other companions of Alexander: Cassander, ruler of Macedon; Lysimachus, ruler of Thrace; and Seleucus I Nicator, ruler of Babylonia and Persia.
Diodorus Siculus is the principal source for the history of the Diadochi, in his 'Library of history' (Bibliotheca historica). Diodorus is often derided by modern historians for his style and inaccuracies, but he preserves many details of the ancient period found nowhere else. Diodorus worked primarily by epitomizing the works of other historians, omitting many details where they did not suit his purpose, which was to illustrate moral lessons from history However, since Diodorus provides the only continuous narrative for the history of the Diadochi, we have no alternative but to rely on his account. Unfortunately, from book XXI onwards (301 BC), including the actual Battle of Ipsus, the Bibliotheca only exists in fragments. Nevertheless, Diodorus provides extensive details of the Fourth War of the Diadochi leading up to Ipsus. It is generally thought that Diodorus's source for much of this period was the now-lost history of the Diadochi written by Hieronymus of Cardia. Hieronymus was a friend of Eumenes, and later became a member of the Antigonid court; he was therefore very much familiar and contemporary with the events he described, and possibly a direct eyewitness to some.